Firm Background

News & Events

 

· Firm News

 

· Articles

 

· Significant Cases

 

· Charitable Events

   

· Safety Investigations

Practice Areas

 

· Products Liability

 

· Personal Injury

 

· Wrongful Death

 

· Insurance Litigation

 

· Intentional Torts

 

· Negligence Actions

 

· Catastrophic Injury

 

· Toxic Torts

   

· Unsafe Seatbelts

 

· Automobile Negligence

   

· Automobile Defects

   

· Motorcycle Accidents

   

· Large Truck Litigation

   

· Bus Accidents

   

· Drunk Driving Accidents

   

· No-Fault Insurance

   

· Automobile Defects

   

· Insurance Bad Faith

   

· Airplane Accidents

   

· Bicycle Accidents

   

· Railroad Litigation

   

· Boat & Jet Ski Injury

   

· Accidental Drowning

   

· Dog Bites

   

· Burn Injuries

   

· Vioxx Recall

   

· Pharmacy Errors

   

· Hospital Infections

   

· Premises Liability

   

· Pinecastle Jeep Range

   

· Rhino All-Terrain Vehicles

Attorney Biographies

 

· John R. Overchuck

 

· Paul Byron

   

· Milette E. Webber

Of Counsel

 

· John K. Overchuck

 

 

Back to Home

Home :: Legal News & Events :: Firm News

Articles

Mattress Flammability

On average, more than 28,000 mattress fires occur annually, killing 571 people, injuring 3,000 and causing $334 million in property damage. For more than thirty years, the fire hazards posed by mattresses intended for residential use have been recognized yet poorly addressed by regulators. Mattress and bedding fires are one of the leading causes of fire related injuries and deaths. Fires such as these fill our nations’ burn units, destroying thousands of lives and families.

The Federal Standard for the Flammability of Mattresses was enacted in 1973 to reduce the potential for ignition of mattresses. This standard was specifically aimed at one ignition source, cigarettes. While fires associated with cigarettes have declined considerably, fires caused by other open flame ignition sources, such as lighters, matches and candles continue to cause a substantial number of injuries and deaths. In fact, children less than 15 years of age represent over 75% of the deaths in fires ignited by candles, matches and lighters and incurred over one-third of the injuries from the fires. Fires ignited by candles, matches, and lighters were also the source of 78% of deaths to victims younger than age 5 and responsible for two-thirds of the deaths among 5 to 14 year olds. In 1991, the proportion of all small open flame fires actually began to exceed those caused by cigarettes and in 1998, open flame fires accounted for 39 percent of mattress fires.

In an effort to meet this standard enacted in 1973, the mattress industry discovered the virtues of polyurethane foam, which allowed mattresses to pass the cigarette burn test. However, one indisputable fact is that the most dangerous and destructive fuel element in a mattress fire is the polyurethane foam, which in a conventional inner-spring mattress is highly combustible. This foam is a mixture of several hazardous chemicals, with some of these chemicals sharing the same combustibility ranking as kerosene and gasoline. Once this foam ignites, an entire bedroom can erupt in flames in mere minutes while producing deadly cyanide gas which is a nerve agent that disables and then kills its victim. These victims are often unconscious and die more often from inhaling this toxic gas than from the flames themselves.

Since the flammability standard was enacted in 1973, scientific knowledge and technology has advanced significantly. It is now apparent that a new flammability standard for mattresses is technologically practical. In fact, it is estimated that an open flame standard designed to reduce heat release and prevent ignition of polyurethane foam could reduce the number of victims of all ages by as many as 300 deaths and 1,460 injuries annually. An open flame standard could also reduce as many as 60 deaths and 130 injuries to children younger than five years of age. This reasonable and realistic technology has been available for many years, but the industry has simply refused to provide it to residential consumers. During the mid-1980’s, this flame-retardant technology had advanced to the point where it could be affordably integrated into mattresses, thus preventing these catastrophic fires. Residential consumers were not given the option to purchase flame-retardant mattresses, even though technology had advanced to make such mattresses easy to manufacture. While on the other hand, the mattress industry began selling these flame-retardant, now easy to manufacture mattresses to institutional purchasers.

Additionally, several test methods and standards have also been available since the 1980’s and could have been adopted by the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to handle the necessity to decrease mattress fires caused by open flame sources. For example, Technical Bulletin 129 (1992) and its predecessor, Technical Bulletin 121 (1980) are both voluntary open flame test procedures for mattresses used in public institutions such as prisons, dormitories, health care facilities and hotels. Another example is Technical Bulletin 117 which is a mandatory standard developed in 1980 to test all filling and stuffing materials used in upholstered furniture for its flame retardant and smolder resistant properties. This standard is applicable for mattresses that contain polyurethane foam. However, mattresses can either contain flame resistant polyurethane foam or have a permanent label stating that the mattress contains non-flame resistant foam. There are also test procedures and standards developed and available through the American Society of Testing & Materials, the National Fire Protection Association, Underwriters Laboratories, the States of Michigan and Massachusetts, as well as international standards in the European Committee and the United Kingdom.

In April 2000, the Consumer Product Safety Commission received a petition for rulemaking to modify the flammability standard for mattresses to include additional ignition sources. This rulemaking remains open and ongoing. Even if the CPSC successfully adopts a new standard, the expected useful life of a mattress is 14 years, therefore, hazardous fire prone mattresses will remain in the homes of American homes for many years to come.

Resources

   

Overchuck & Byron, P.A.

Orlando Personal Injury Lawyers & Attorneys    

[ Home ]   [ Firm ]   [ Practices ]   [ News ]   Sitemap ]   [ Legal ]

A PaperStreet Web Design  

Lawyers Serving Orlando & Orange County: Personal Injury, Product Liability, Wrongful Death, Insurance Litigation, Intentional Torts, Negligence Actions, Catastrophic Injury, Toxic Torts, Unsafe Seatbelts, Automobile Negligence, Burn Injuries, Vioxx Recall

The firm's attorneys are admitted to practice in the State of Florida. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.

The firm's attorneys are admitted to practice in the State of Florida. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience.
Orlando Personal Injury Attorney Overchuck & Byron, P.A. Home
Contact Orlando Personal Injury Attorney Overchuck & Byron, P.A.